• Home
  • Tax Law and Commentary Online
  • SDCA1999 | Section 134A Penalties
Change year: 2010

Section 134A Penalties

Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section |
Unlock_icon
Sign up to access full section commentary and legislation back years
subscription or 30 day access with no obligation

Amendments

Section 134A inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act 2008 section 98 and Schedule 5 Part 5 Chapter 1 para 5(d) effective from 24 December 2008 (Subs (2)(c) and (4)(c) effective from a day to be appointed by the Minister for Finance).

(1) In this section—

"carelessly" means failure to take reasonable care;

"liability to duty" means a liability to the amount of the difference specified in subsection (7), (8) or (9) arising from any matter referred to in subsections (2) and (4);

"instruction", "relevant system" and "system-member" have each the same meaning as they have, respectively, in section 68(2);

"person" means—

(a) for the purposes of subsections (2)(b) and (4)(b), a system-member, and

(b) for the purposes of subsections (2)(c) and (4)(c), an accountable person where an electronic return or a paper return is caused to be delivered, or is delivered, to the Commissioners;

"prompted qualifying disclosure", in relation to a person, means a qualifying disclosure that has been made to the Commissioners or to a Revenue officer in the period between—

(a) the date on which the person is notified by a Revenue officer of the date on which an investigation or inquiry into any matter occasioning a liability to duty of that person will start, and

(b) the date that the investigation or inquiry starts;

"qualifying disclosure", in relation to a person, means—

(a) in relation to a penalty referred to in subsection (3), a disclosure that the Commissioners are satisfied is a disclosure of complete information in relation to, and full particulars of, all matters occasioning a liability to duty that gives rise to a penalty referred to in subsection (3), and full particulars of all matters occasioning any liability to tax that gives rise to a penalty referred to in section 1077E(4) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, section 27A(4) of the Value-Added Tax Act 1972 and the application of section 1077E(4) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 to the Capital Acquisitions Tax Consolidation Act 2003, and

(b) in relation to a penalty referred to in subsection (5), a disclosure that the Commissioners are satisfied is a disclosure of complete information in relation to, and full particulars of, all matters occasioning a liability to duty that gives rise to a penalty referred to in subsection (5),

made in writing to the Commissioners or to a Revenue officer and signed by or on behalf of that person and that is accompanied by—

(i) a declaration, to the best of that person’s knowledge, information and belief, made in writing that all matters contained in the disclosure are correct and complete, and

(ii) a payment of the tax and duty payable in respect of any matter contained in the disclosure and the interest on late payment of that tax and duty;

"Revenue officer" means an officer of the Commissioners;

"unprompted qualifying disclosure", in relation to a person, means a qualifying disclosure that the Revenue Commissioners are satisfied has been voluntarily furnished to them—

(a) before an investigation or inquiry had been started by them or by a Revenue officer into any matter occasioning a liability to duty of that person, or

(b) where the person is notified by a Revenue officer of the date on which an investigation or inquiry into any matter occasioning a liability to duty of that person will start, before that notification.

What is the new Revenue code of practice for penalties?

(1) This section puts the Revenue audit code of practice, in so far as it relates to penalties, into legislation....

to read the full commentary

(2) Where any person deliberately—

(a) executes any instrument in which all the facts and circumstances affecting the liability of such instrument to duty, or the amount of the duty with which such instrument is chargeable, are not fully and truly set forth in the instrument or in any statement to which section 8(2) relates,

(b) enters or causes to be entered an incorrect instruction in a relevant system and such incorrect instruction gives rise to an underpayment of stamp duty, or results in a claim for exemption from duty to which there is no entitlement, or

(c) causes an incorrect electronic return or a paper return to be delivered, or delivers an incorrect electronic return or a paper return, to the Commissioners which does not reflect all the facts and circumstances affecting the liability of such instrument to duty or the amount of the duty with which such instrument is chargeable that are required by the Commissioners to be disclosed on such return,

then that person shall incur a penalty of €1,265 and a further penalty.

Am I liable to a penalty if I deliberately executed a deed, or filed an incorrect return for stamp duty purposes?

(2) Yes. You are liable to a penalty if you:...

to read the full commentary

(3) The further penalty referred to—

(a) in subsection (2) in relation to paragraph (a) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (7),

(b) in subsection (2) in relation to paragraph (b) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (8), and

(c) in subsection (2) in relation to paragraph (c) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (9),

reduced, where the person who incurred the penalty co-operated fully with any investigation or inquiry started by the Commissioners or by a Revenue officer into any matter occasioning a liability to duty of that person, to—

(i) 75 per cent of that amount where paragraph (ii) or (iii) does not apply,

(ii) 50 per cent of that amount where a prompted qualifying disclosure has been made by the person, or

(iii) 10 per cent of that amount where an unprompted qualifying disclosure has been made by the person.

Can a penalty for deliberate default be reduced if I make a qualifying declaration in relation to stamp duty?

(3) Yes. the penalty starts off at 100% of the difference between the tax paid and the tax correctly payable....

to read the full commentary

(4) Where any person carelessly but not deliberately—

(a) executes any instrument in which all the facts and circumstances affecting the liability of such instrument to duty, or the amount of the duty with which such instrument is chargeable, are not fully and truly set forth in the instrument or in any statement to which section 8(2) relates,

(b) enters or causes to be entered an incorrect instruction in a relevant system and such incorrect instruction gives rise to an underpayment of duty, or results in a claim for exemption from duty to which there is no entitlement, or

(c) causes an incorrect electronic return or a paper return to be delivered, or delivers an incorrect electronic return or a paper return, to the Commissioners which does not reflect all the facts and circumstances affecting the liability of such instrument to duty or the amount of the duty with which such instrument is chargeable that are required by the Commissioners to be disclosed on such return,

then that person shall incur a penalty of €1,265 and a further penalty.

Am I liable to a penalty if I carelessly execute a deed or file an incorrect return for stamp duty purposes?

(4) Yes. You are liable to a penalty if you:...

to read the full commentary

(5)(a) The further penalty referred to—

(i) in subsection (4) in relation to paragraph (a) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (7),

(ii) in subsection (4) in relation to paragraph (b) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (8), and

(iii) in subsection (4) in relation to paragraph (c) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (9),

reduced to 40 per cent where the excess referred to in subparagraph (I) of paragraph (b) applies and to 20 per cent in other cases.

(b) Where the person who incurred the penalty co-operated fully with any investigation or inquiry started by the Commissioners or by a Revenue officer into any matter occasioning a liability to duty of that person the further penalty referred to—

(i) in subsection (4) in relation to paragraph (a) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (7),

(ii) in subsection (4) in relation to paragraph (b) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (8), and

(iii) in subsection (4) in relation to paragraph (c) of that subsection, shall be the amount specified in subsection (9),

reduced—

(I) where the amount of the difference referred to in subsection (7), (8) or (9), as the case may be, exceeds 15 per cent of the amount referred to in subsection (7)(b), (8)(b) or (9)(b), as the case may be, to—

(A) 30 per cent of the amount of the difference (in clauses (B) and (C) referred to as "that amount") where clause (B) or (C) does not apply,

(B) 20 per cent of that amount where a prompted qualifying disclosure has been made by that person, or

(C) 5 per cent of that amount where an unprompted qualifying disclosure has been made by that person,

or

(II) where the amount of the difference referred to in subsection (7), (8) or (9), as the case may be, does not exceed 15 per cent of the amount referred to in subsection (7)(b), (8)(b) or (9)(b), as the case may be, to—

(A) 15 per cent of the amount of the difference (in clauses (B) and (C) referred to as "that amount") where clause (B) or (C) does not apply,

(B) 10 per cent of that amount where a prompted qualifying disclosure has been made by that person, or

(C) 3 per cent of that amount where an unprompted qualifying disclosure has been made by that person.

Can a penalty for careless default be reduced if I make a qualifying declaration in relation to stamp duty?

(5) Yes. A careless default carries a penalty as follows:...

to read the full commentary

(6) Where any person neither deliberately nor carelessly—

(a) executes an instrument and it comes to that person’s notice that the instrument or any statement to which section 8(2) relates does not fully and truly set forth all the facts and circumstances,

(b) enters or causes to be entered an instruction in a relevant system and it comes to that person’s notice that the instruction was an incorrect instruction, or

(c) causes to be delivered or delivers an electronic return or a paper return and it comes to that person’s notice that the electronic return or paper return does not reflect all the facts and circumstances that are required by the Commissioners to be disclosed on such return,

then, unless the error is remedied without unreasonable delay, the person shall be treated for the purposes of this section as having acted deliberately.

Can I self-correct an innocent error in relation to stamp duty?

(6) Yes, but you must remedy the error without unreasonable delay.

(7) The amount referred to in [subsection (3)(a) and paragraphs (a)(i) and (b)(i) of subsection (5)]1 shall be the amount of the difference between—

(a) the amount of duty payable in respect of the instrument based on the facts and circumstances set forth and delivered, and

(b) the amount of the duty which would have been the amount so payable if the instrument and any accompanying statement had fully and truly set forth all the facts and circumstances referred to in subsections (1) and (2) of section 8.

Amendments

1 Substituted by Finance Act 2009 section 30(3)(c)(i) as respects penalties incurred on or after 3 June 2009.

What is the penalty if I deliberately or carelessly execute a deed incorrectly?

(7) The penalty is 100% of the difference between the tax payable based on the incorrect details and the tax payable on the basis of a correctly completed return.

(8) The amount referred to in [subsection (3)(b) and paragraphs (a)(ii) and (b)(ii) of subsection (5)]1 shall be the amount of the difference between—

(a) the duty so paid (if any), and

(b) the duty which would have been payable if the instruction had been entered correctly.

Amendments

1 Substituted by Finance Act 2009 section 30(3)(c)(ii) as respects penalties incurred on or after 3 June 2009.

What is the penalty if I deliberately or carelessly enter an incorrect electronic instruction resulting in an underpayment of stamp duty?

(8) The penalty is 100% of the difference between the tax paid before the inquiry started and the tax payable on the basis of a correctly completed return.

(9) The amount referred to in [subsection (3)(c) and paragraphs (a)(iii) and (b)(iii) of subsection (5)]1 shall be the amount of the difference between—

(a) the amount of duty payable in respect of the instrument based on the facts and circumstances disclosed on such return, and

(b) the amount of duty that would have been the amount so payable if all the facts and circumstances affecting the liability of such instrument to duty or the amount of the duty with which such instrument is chargeable, that are required to be disclosed on such return by the Commissioners, had been disclosed to them.

Amendments

1 Substituted by Finance Act 2009 section 30(3)(c)(iii) from 24 December 2008 and, accordingly, the provisions of paragraph 6(b) of Schedule 5 to the Finance (No. 2) Act 2008 relating to references to subsections (2)(c) and (4)(c) of this section apply to the provisions concerned as amended by that subparagraph.

What is the penalty if I deliberately or carelessly file an incorrect electronic return for stamp duty purposes?

(9) The penalty is 100% of the difference between the tax paid before the inquiry started and the tax payable on the basis of a correctly completed return.

(10) Where a second qualifying disclosure is made by a person within 5 years of such person’s first qualifying disclosure, then as regards matters pertaining to the second disclosure—

(a) in relation to subsection (3)—

(i) paragraph (ii) shall apply as if "75 per cent" were substituted for "50 per cent", and

(ii) paragraph (iii) shall apply as if "55 per cent" were substituted for "10 per cent", and

(b) in relation to subparagraph (I) of subsection (5)(b)—

(i) clause (B) shall apply as if "30 per cent" were substituted for "20 per cent", and

(ii) clause (C) shall apply as if "20 per cent" were substituted for "5 per cent".

Can a penalty be reduced if it is my second qualifying disclosure in relation to stamp duty?

(10) Yes. If the fault was deliberate, the penalty is reduced:...

to read the full commentary

(11) Where a third or subsequent qualifying disclosure is made by a person within 5 years of such person’s second qualifying disclosure, then as regards matters pertaining to the third or subsequent disclosure, as the case may be—

(a) the further penalty referred to in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subsection (3) shall not be reduced, and

(b) the reduction referred to in subparagraph (I) of subsection (5)(b) shall not apply.

Can a penalty be reduced if it is my third qualifying disclosure in relation to stamp duty?

(11) No - not if the disclosure is made within five years of the second qualifying disclosure.

(12) A disclosure, in relation to a person, shall not be a qualifying disclosure where—

(a) before the disclosure is made, a Revenue officer had started an inquiry or an investigation into any matter contained in that disclosure and had contacted or notified the person, or a person representing the person, in this regard, or

(b) matters contained in the disclosure are matters—

(i) that have become known or are about to become known, to the Commissioners through their own investigations or through an investigation conducted by a statutory body or agency,

(ii) that are within the scope of an inquiry being carried out wholly or partly in public, or

(iii) to which the person who made the disclosure is linked, or about to be linked, publicly.

When is a disclosure not regarded as a qualifying disclosure for stamp duty purposes?

(12) A disclosure does not qualify as qualifying disclosure if:...

to read the full commentary
Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section