• Home
  • Tax Law and Commentary Online
  • TCA1997 | Section 908 [Application to High Court seeking order requiring information: financial institutions]
Change year: 2010

Section 908 [Application to High Court seeking order requiring information: financial institutions]

Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section |
Unlock_icon
Sign up to access full section commentary and legislation back years
subscription or 30 day access with no obligation

Amendments

Section 908 and heading substituted by Finance Act 1999 section 207(i).

(1) In this section―

"judge" means a judge of the High Court;

"a taxpayer" means any person including―

(a) a person whose identity is not known to the authorised officer, and a group or class of persons whose individual identities are not so known, and

(b) a person by or in respect of whom a declaration has been made under section 263(1) declaring that the person is beneficially entitled to all or part of the interest in relation to a deposit.

What definitions are relevant in the context of making an application to the High Court seeking information from a financial institution?

(1) A taxpayer means any person. The term includes:...

to read the full commentary

(2) An authorised officer may, subject to this section, make an application to a judge for an order requiring a financial institution, to do either or both of the following, namely―

(a) to make available for inspection by the authorised officer, such books, records or other documents as are in the financial institution's power, possession or procurement as contain, or may (in the authorised officer's opinion formed on reasonable grounds) contain information relevant to a liability in relation to a taxpayer,

(b) to furnish to the authorised officer such information, explanations and particulars as the authorised officer may reasonably require, being information, explanations and particulars that are relevant to any such liability,

and which are specified in the application.

What power does an authorised officer have to apply to a High Court judge for an order compelling disclosure of certain information by the financial institution?

(2) An authorised officer may apply to a High Court Judge for an order requiring a financial institution (section 906A) to:...

to read the full commentary

(3) An authorised officer shall not make application under subsection (2) without the consent in writing of a Revenue Commissioner, and without being satisfied―

(a) that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the taxpayer, or, where the taxpayer is a group or class of persons, all or any one of those persons, may have failed or may fail to comply with any provision of the Acts,

(b) that any such failure is likely to have led or to lead to serious prejudice to the proper assessment or collection of tax (having regard to the amount of a liability in relation to the taxpayer, or where the taxpayer is a group or class of persons, the amount of a liability in relation to all or any one of them, that arises or might arise from such failure), and

(c) that the information―

(i) which is likely to be contained in the books, records or other documents to which the application relates, or

(ii) which is likely to arise from the information, explanations and particulars to which the application relates,

is relevant to the proper assessment or collection of tax.

What consent must an authorised officer obtain before he/she can apply for a High Court judge for an order requiring the financial institution to produce certain information?

(3) Before making an application under (2), the authorised officer must satisfy him/herself that:...

to read the full commentary

(4) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (2), the authorised officer may make an application under that subsection to the judge for an order in respect of the matters referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of that subsection in so far as they relate to a person who is connected with the taxpayer.

In what circumstances can an authorised officer make an application to a High Court judge for an order in relation to a person connected with the taxpayer?

(4) The notice under (2) may specify books of a person connected with the taxpayer....

to read the full commentary

(5) Where the judge, to whom an application is made under subsection (2), is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for the application being made, the judge may, subject to such conditions as he or she may consider proper and specify in the order, make an order requiring the financial institution―

(a) to make available for inspection by the authorised officer, such books, records or other documents, and

(b) to furnish to the authorised officer such information, explanations and particulars,

as may be specified in the order.

What information must a financial institution produce under High Court order when the judge considers there are reasonable grounds for such an application?

(5) If the judge to whom the application is made is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for making the order, he/she may order the financial institutions to produce the required records and particulars.

(6) The persons who may be treated as a taxpayer for the purposes of this section include a company which has been dissolved and an individual who has died.

What persons are included in the definition of taxpayer?

(6) A taxpayer (see (1)) includes a company which has been dissolved or an individual who has died.

(6A) Where in compliance with an order made under subsection (5), a financial institution makes available for inspection by an authorised officer, books, records or other documents, the financial institution shall afford the authorised officer reasonable assistance, including information, explanations and particulars, in relation to the use of all the electronic or other automatic means, if any, by which the books, records or other documents, in so far as they are in a non-legible form, are capable of being reproduced in a legible form, and any data equipment or any associated apparatus or material.

Amendments

Subs (6A) inserted by Finance Act 2002 section 132(f).

What responsibility does a financial institution have to make information available under an order from the High Court?

(6A) The taxpayer must provide reasonable help to the authorised officer. This includes help in relation to computerised accounts (i.e., electronically stored data).

(6B) Where in compliance with an order made under subsection (5), a financial institution makes books, records or other documents available for inspection by the authorised officer, the authorised officer may make extracts from or copies of all or any part of the books, records or other documents.

Amendments

Subs (6B) inserted by Finance Act 2002 section 132(f).

Is an authorised officer entitled to make copies of information produced for inspection under a High Court order?

(6B) The authorised officer may take copies of or extracts from the books and records produced for inspection.

(7) Every hearing of an application for an order under this section and of any appeal in connection with that application shall be held in camera.

Must an application for a High Court order be held in camera?

(7) Yes.

(8) Where a judge makes an order under this section, he or she may also, on the application of the authorised officer concerned, make a further order prohibiting, for such period as the judge may consider proper and specify in the order, any transfer of, or any dealing with, without the consent of the judge, any assets or moneys of the person to whom the order relates that are in the custody of the financial institution at the time the order is made.

What further orders can a High Court judge make in connection with an application for disclosure of financial information by financial institutions?

(8) The judge may also make an order freezing the person's assets in the bank for such time as the judge considers proper.

(9)(a) Where―

(i) a copy of any affidavit and exhibits grounding an application under subsection (2) or (8) and any order made under subsection (5) or (8) are to be made available to the taxpayer, or the taxpayer's solicitor or to the financial institution or the financial institution's solicitor, as the case may be, and

(ii) the judge is satisfied on the hearing of the application that there are reasonable grounds in the public interest that such copy of an affidavit, exhibits or order, as the case may be, should not include the name or address of the authorised officer,

such copy, or copies or order shall not include the name or address of the authorised officer.

(b) Where, on any application to the judge to vary or discharge an order made under this section, it is desired to cross-examine the deponent of any affidavit filed by or on behalf of the authorised officer and the judge is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds in the public interest to so order, the judge shall order either or both of the following―

(i) that the name and address of the authorised officer shall not be disclosed in court, and

(ii) that such cross-examination shall only take place in the sight and hearing of the judge and in the hearing only of all other persons present at such cross-examination.

What matters of public interest will the judge consider in dealing with applications for a High Court order?

(9) If the judge is satisfied that it is in the public interest, the name of the authorised officer need not be mentioned on copies of affidavits and evidential documents relating to the order....

to read the full commentary
Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section