• Home
  • Tax Law and Commentary Online
  • TCA1997 | Section 99 Charge on assignment of lease granted at undervalue
Change year: 2010

Section 99 Charge on assignment of lease granted at undervalue

Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section |
Unlock_icon
Sign up to access full section commentary and legislation back years
subscription or 30 day access with no obligation

(1) Where the terms subject to which a lease of a duration not exceeding 50 years was granted are such that the lessor, having regard to values prevailing at the time the lease was granted, and on the assumption that the negotiations for the lease were at arm's length, could have required the payment of an additional sum (in this section referred to as "the amount forgone") by means of a premium or an additional premium for the grant of the lease, then, on any assignment of the lease for a consideration-

(a) where the lease has not previously been assigned, exceeding the premium (if any) for which it was granted, or

(b) where the lease has been previously assigned, exceeding the consideration for which it was last assigned,

the amount of the excess, in so far as it is not greater than the amount foregone reduced by the amount of any such excess arising on a previous assignment of the lease, shall, in the same proportion as the amount forgone would under section 98(1) have been treated as rent if it had been a premium under a lease, be treated as profits or gains of the assignor chargeable to the tax under Case IV of Schedule D.

What are the tax consequences if I assign a lease at undervalue?

(1) If you assign a lease on which you could have charged a premium, you are caught for tax under Schedule D Case IV on the amount (the profit) you receive for assigning the lease. That amount is treated as a "deemed premium" for the grant of the lea...

to read the full commentary

(2) In computing the profits or gains of a trade of dealing in land, any trading receipts within this section shall be treated as reduced by the amount on which tax is chargeable by virtue of this section.

If I am a dealer in land, should I exclude from my profits any sum received for assigning a lease at undervalue?

(2) Yes. If you are a dealer in land, in computing your profits under Schedule D Case I (section 640), you must exclude receipts taxed under this section....

to read the full commentary
Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section