• Home
  • Tax Law and Commentary Online
  • VATA1972 | Section 27A Penalty for deliberately or carelessly making incorrect returns, etc
Change year: 2010

Section 27A Penalty for deliberately or carelessly making incorrect returns, etc

Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section |
Unlock_icon
Sign up to access full section commentary and legislation back years
subscription or 30 day access with no obligation

Amendments

Section 27A inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act 2008 section 98 and Schedule 5 Part 3 para 3(c) from 24 December 2008.

(1) In this section—

"carelessly" means failure to take reasonable care;

"liability to tax" means a liability to the amount of the difference specified in subsection (11) or (12) arising from any matter referred to in subsection (2), (3), (5) or (6);

"period" means taxable period, accounting period or other period, as the context requires;

"prompted qualifying disclosure", in relation to a person, means a qualifying disclosure that has been made to the Revenue Commissioners or to a Revenue officer in the period between—

(a) the date on which a person is notified by a Revenue officer of the date on which an investigation or inquiry into any matter occasioning a liability to tax of that person will start, and

(b) the date that the investigation or inquiry starts;

"qualifying disclosure", in relation to a person, means—

(a) in relation to a penalty referred to in subsection (4), a disclosure that the Revenue Commissioners are satisfied is a disclosure of complete information in relation to, and full particulars of, all matters occasioning a liability to tax that gives rise to a penalty referred to in subsection (4), and full particulars of all matters occasioning any liability to tax or duty that gives rise to a penalty referred to in section 1077E(4) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, section 134A(2) of the Stamp Duties Consolidation Act 1999 and the application of section 1077E(4) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 to the Capital Acquisitions Tax Consolidation Act 2003, and

(b) in relation to a penalty referred to in subsection (7), a disclosure that the Revenue Commissioners are satisfied is a disclosure of complete information in relation to, and full particulars of, all matters occasioning a liability to tax that gives rise to a penalty referred to in subsection (7) for the relevant period,

made in writing to the Revenue Commissioners or to a Revenue officer and signed by or on behalf of that person and that is accompanied by—

(i) a declaration, to the best of that person’s knowledge, information and belief, made in writing that all matters contained in the disclosure are correct and complete, and

(ii) a payment of the tax and duty payable in respect of any matter contained in the disclosure and the interest on late payment of that tax and duty;

"Revenue officer" means an officer of the Revenue Commissioners;

"unprompted qualifying disclosure", in relation to a person, means a qualifying disclosure that the Revenue Commissioners are satisfied has been voluntarily furnished to them—

(a) before an investigation or inquiry had been started by them or by a Revenue officer into any matter occasioning a liability to tax of that person, or

(b) where the person is notified by a Revenue officer of the date on which an investigation or inquiry into any matter occasioning a liability to tax of that person will start, before that notification.

What is the Revenue code of practice for penalties?

(1) This section puts the Revenue audit code of practice, in so far as it relates to penalties, into legislation....

to read the full commentary

(2) Where a person furnishes a return or makes a claim or declaration for the purposes of this Act or of regulations made under it and, in so doing, the person deliberately, furnishes an incorrect return, or makes an incorrect claim or declaration, then that person shall be liable to a penalty.

Am I liable to a penalty if I deliberately file an incorrect VAT return?

(2) Yes. You are liable to a penalty if you:...

to read the full commentary

(3) Where a person deliberately fails to comply with a requirement in accordance with this Act or regulations to furnish a return, then that person shall be liable to a penalty.

Am I liable to a penalty if I deliberately fail to file a VAT return?

(3) Yes.

(4) The penalty referred to—

(a) in subsection (2), shall be the amount specified in subsection (11), and

(b) in subsection (3), shall be the amount specified in subsection (12),

reduced, where the person liable to the penalty cooperated fully with any investigation or inquiry started by the Revenue Commissioners or by a Revenue officer into any matter occasioning a liability to tax of that person, to—

(i) 75 per cent of that amount where paragraph (ii) or (iii) does not apply,

(ii) 50 per cent of that amount where a prompted qualifying disclosure is made by that person, or

(iii) 10 per cent of that amount where an unprompted qualifying disclosure has been made by that person.

Can a "deliberate default" penalty be reduced if I make a qualifying disclosure?

(4) Yes. the penalty starts off at 100% of the difference between the tax paid and the tax correctly payable....

to read the full commentary

(5) Where a person furnishes a return or makes a claim or declaration for the purposes of this Act or of regulations made under it and, in so doing, the person carelessly, but not deliberately, furnishes an incorrect return or makes an incorrect claim or declaration, then that person shall be liable to a penalty.

Am I liable to a penalty if I carelessly file an incorrect VAT return?

(5) Yes. You are liable to a penalty if you:...

to read the full commentary

(6) Where a person carelessly but not deliberately fails to comply with a requirement in accordance with this Act or regulations to furnish a return, then that person shall be liable to a penalty.

Am I liable to a penalty if I carelessly fail to file a VAT return?

(6) Yes.

(7)(a) The penalty referred to—

(i) in subsection (5) shall be the amount specified in subsection (11), and

(ii) in subsection (6) shall be the amount specified in subsection (12),

reduced to 40 per cent in cases where the excess referred to in subparagraph (I) of paragraph (b) applies and to 20 per cent in other cases.

(b) Where the person liable to the penalty cooperated fully with any investigation or inquiry started by the Revenue Commissioners or by a Revenue officer into any matter occasioning a liability to tax of that person, the penalty referred to—

(i) in subsection (5) shall be the amount specified in subsection (11), and

(ii) in subsection (6) shall be the amount specified in subsection (12),

reduced—

(I) where the difference referred to in subsection (11) or (12), as the case may be, exceeds 15 per cent of the amount referred to in paragraph (b) of subsection (11) or paragraph (b) of subsection (12), to—

(A) 30 per cent of that difference where clause (B) or (C) does not apply,

(B) 20 per cent of that difference where a prompted qualifying disclosure is made by that person, or

(C) 5 per cent of that difference where an unprompted qualifying disclosure is made by that person,

or

(II) where the difference referred to in subsection (11) or (12), as the case may be, does not exceed 15 per cent of the amount referred to in paragraph (b) of subsection (11) or paragraph (b) of subsection (12) to—

(A) 15 per cent of that difference where clause (B) or (C) does not apply,

(B) 10 per cent of that difference where a prompted qualifying disclosure is made by that person, or

(C) 3 per cent of that difference where an unprompted qualifying disclosure is made by that person.

Can a penalty for careless default be reduced if I make a qualifying disclosure?

(7) Yes. A careless default carries a penalty as follows:...

to read the full commentary

(8) Where, for the purposes of this Act or of regulations, a person deliberately or carelessly produces, furnishes, gives, sends or otherwise makes use of, any incorrect invoice, registration number, credit note, debit note, receipt, account, voucher, bank statement, estimate, statement, information, book, document or record, then that person shall be liable to—

(a) a penalty of €3,000 where that person has acted carelessly, or

(b) a penalty of €5,000 where that person has acted deliberately.

Am I liable to a penalty if I deliberately or carelessly provide incorrect details to Revenue?

(8) Yes. The penalty is €5,000 if you acted deliberately and €3,000 if you acted carelessly.

(9) Where any return, claim or declaration as is mentioned in subsection (2) or (5) was furnished or made by a person, neither deliberately nor carelessly, and it comes to that person’s notice that it was incorrect, then, unless the error is remedied without unreasonable delay, the return, claim or declaration shall be treated for the purposes of this section as having been deliberately made or submitted by that person.

Can I self-correct an innocent error?

(9) Yes, but you must remedy the error without unreasonable delay.

(10) Subject to section 1077D(2) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, proceedings or applications for the recovery of any penalty under this section shall not be out of time by reason that they are commenced after the time allowed by section 30.

Can penalty proceedings be commenced more than six years after the penalty was incurred?

(10) Yes.

(11) The amount referred to in paragraph (a) of subsection (4) and in paragraph (a)(i) of subsection (7) shall be the difference between—

(a) the amount of tax (if any) paid or claimed by the person concerned for the relevant period on the basis of the incorrect return, claim or declaration as furnished or otherwise made, and

(b) the amount properly payable by, or refundable to, that person for that period.

What is the penalty where I deliberately file an incorrect VAT return?

(11) The penalty is 100% of the difference between the tax payable based on the incorrect details and the tax payable on the basis of a correctly completed return.

(12) The amount referred to in paragraph (b) of subsection (4) and in paragraph (b)(ii) of subsection (7) shall be the difference between—

(a) the amount of tax (if any) paid by that person for the relevant period before the start by the Revenue Commissioners or by any Revenue officer of any inquiry or investigation where the Revenue Commissioners had announced publicly that they had started an inquiry or investigation or where the Revenue Commissioners have, or a Revenue officer has, carried out an inquiry or investigation in respect of any matter that would have been included in the return if the return had been furnished by that person and the return had been correct, and

(b) the amount of tax properly payable by that person for that period.

What is the penalty if I deliberately fail to file a VAT return?

(12) The penalty is 100% of the difference between the tax paid before the inquiry started and the tax payable on the basis of a correctly completed return.

(13) Where a second qualifying disclosure is made by a person within 5 years of such person’s first qualifying disclosure, then as regards matters pertaining to that second disclosure—

(a) in relation to subsection (4)—

(i) paragraph (ii) shall apply as if "75 per cent" were substituted for "50 per cent", and

(ii) paragraph (iii) shall apply as if "55 per cent" were substituted for "10 per cent",

and

(b) in relation to subparagraph (I) of subsection (7)(b)—

(i) clause (B) shall apply as if "30 per cent" were substituted for "20 per cent", and

(ii) clause (C) shall apply as if "20 per cent" were substituted for "5 per cent".

Can a penalty be reduced if it is my second qualifying disclosure?

(13) Yes. If the fault was deliberate, the penalty is reduced:...

to read the full commentary

(14) Where a third or subsequent qualifying disclosure is made by a person within 5 years of such person’s second qualifying disclosure, then as regards matters pertaining to that third or subsequent disclosure, as the case may be—

(a) the penalty referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (4) shall not be reduced, and

(b) the reduction referred to in subparagraph (I) of subsection (7)(b) shall not apply.

Can a penalty be reduced if it is my third qualifying disclosure?

(14) No - not if the disclosure is made within five years of the second qualifying disclosure.

(15) A disclosure in relation to a person shall not be a qualifying disclosure where—

(a) before the disclosure is made, a Revenue officer had started an inquiry or investigation into any matter contained in that disclosure and had contacted or notified that person, or a person representing that person, in this regard, or

(b) matters contained in the disclosure are matters—

(i) that have become known, or are about to become known, to the Revenue Commissioners through their own investigations or through an investigation conducted by a statutory body or agency,

(ii) that are within the scope of an inquiry being carried out wholly or partly in public, or

(iii) to which the person who made the disclosure is linked, or about to be linked, publicly.

When is a disclosure not regarded as a qualifying disclosure?

(15) A disclosure does not qualify as qualifying disclosure if:...

to read the full commentary

(16) For the purposes of this section, any return, claim or declaration submitted on behalf of a person shall be deemed to have been submitted by that person unless that person proves that it was submitted without that person’s consent or knowledge.

Can I claim that accounts were submitted without my knowledge?

(16) No. Returns or accounts filed in your name are deemed to have been submitted by you unless you can prove that they were filed without your knowledge or consent.

(17) Where a person mentioned in subsection (2), (3), (5) or (6) is a body of persons the secretary shall be liable to a separate penalty of €1,500 or, in the case of deliberate behaviour, €3,000.

As company secretary, am I liable to a separate penalty in relation to VAT offences?

(17) Yes, the penalty is €1,500, or €3,000 where you acted deliberately.

(18) If a person, in a case in which that person represents that he or she is a registered person or that goods imported by him or her were so imported for the purposes of a business carried on by him or her, improperly procures the importation of goods without payment of tax in circumstances in which tax is chargeable, then that person shall be liable to a penalty of €4,000 and, in addition, that person shall be liable to pay to the Revenue Commissioners the amount of any tax that should have been paid on the importation.

What is the penalty if I improperly procure the importation of goods by representing that I am registered for VAT?

(18) A penalty of €4,000 applies to you if you improperly import goods (from outside the EU) without paying VAT if you represent that the goods are for your business or that you are VAT-registered.

(19) If a person acquires goods without payment of value-added tax (as referred to in Council Directive No. 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 (OJ No. L347 of 11 December 2006, p. 1)) in another Member State as a result of the declaration of an incorrect registration number, that person shall be liable to a penalty of €4,000 and, in addition, that person shall be liable to pay to the Revenue Commissioners an amount equal to the amount of tax which would have been chargeable on an intra-Community acquisition of those goods if that declaration had been the declaration of a correct registration number.

What is the penalty if I acquire goods in another EU state without payment of VAT by declaring an incorrect VAT number?

(19) A penalty of €4,000 applies to you if you acquire goods VAT-free in another EU State by declaring a false VAT number. You are also liable to pay the VAT that would have arisen in respect of the ICA of the goods to Ireland, had a correct VAT nu...

to read the full commentary

(20) Where, in pursuance of regulations made for the purposes of section 13(1)(a), tax on the supply of any goods has been remitted or repaid and—

(a) the goods are found in the State after the date on which they were alleged to have been or were to be exported, or

(b) any condition specified in the regulations or imposed by the Revenue Commissioners is not complied with,

and the presence of the goods in the State after that date or the non-compliance with the condition has not been authorised for the purposes of this subsection by the Revenue Commissioners, then the goods shall be liable to forfeiture and the tax which was remitted or repaid shall be charged upon and become payable forthwith by the person to whom the goods were supplied or any person in whose possession the goods are found in the State and the provisions of sections 960I(1), 960J, 960L and 960N of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 shall apply accordingly, but the Revenue Commissioners may, if they think fit, waive payment of the whole or part of that tax.

What penalty applies where goods allegedly exported are found to be present in the State?

(20) Zero-rated goods found in the State after they have been allegedly exported are liable to forfeiture. Unpaid VAT on the supply of the goods is immediately payable by the person in whose possession the goods are found....

to read the full commentary

(21)(a) Where goods—

(i) were supplied at the rate of zero per cent subject to the condition that they were to be dispatched or transported outside the State in accordance with [paragraph 1(1), (2), 3(1) or 7(3) of Schedule 2]1 and the goods were not so dispatched or transported,

(ii) were acquired without payment of value-added tax referred to in Council Directive No. 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 (OJ No. L347 of 11 December 2006, p. 1) in another Member State as a result of the declaration of an incorrect registration number,

(iii) were acquired in another Member State and those goods are new means of transport in respect of which the acquirer—

(I) makes an intra-Community acquisition in the State,

(II) is not entitled to a deduction under section 12 in respect of the tax chargeable on that acquisition, and

(III) fails to account for the tax due on that acquisition in accordance with section 19,

or

(iv) are being supplied by an accountable person who has not complied with the provisions of section 9(2),

then those goods shall be liable to forfeiture.

(b) Whenever an officer authorised by the Revenue Commissioners reasonably suspects that goods are liable to forfeiture in accordance with paragraph (a) the goods may be detained by the said officer until such examination, inquiries or investigations as may be deemed necessary by the said officer, or by another authorised officer of the Revenue Commissioners, have been made for the purpose of determining to the satisfaction of either officer whether or not the goods were so supplied or acquired.

(c) When a determination referred to in paragraph (b) has been made in respect of any goods, or upon the expiry of a period of two months [from the date on which the goods were detained under that paragraph, whichever is the earlier, those goods shall be seized]2 as liable to forfeiture or released.

(d) For the purposes of this section "the declaration of an incorrect registration number" means—

(i) the declaration by a person of another person’s registration number,

(ii) the declaration by a person of a number which is not an actual registration number which that person purports to be his or her registration number,

(iii) the declaration by a person of a registration number which is cancelled,

(iv) the declaration by a person of a registration number which was obtained from the Revenue Commissioners by supplying incorrect information, or

(v) the declaration by a person of a registration number which was obtained from the Revenue Commissioners for the purposes of acquiring goods without payment of value-added tax referred to in Council Directive No. 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 (OJ No. L347 of 11 December 2006, p. 1), and not for any bona fide business purpose.

Amendments

1 Substituted by Finance Act 2010 section 131 and Schedule 2 item 24.

2 Substituted by Finance Act 2010 section 159 and Schedule 4 para 4(g) from 3 April 2010.

What penalty applies where goods were zero-rated on condition they be transported out of the State and were acquired VAT-free in another EU State by means of a false VAT number?

(21) The following goods are liable to forfeiture:...

to read the full commentary

(22) The provisions of the Customs Acts relating to forfeiture and condemnation of goods shall apply to goods liable to forfeiture under subsection (20) or (21) as if they had become liable to forfeiture under those Acts and all powers which may be exercised by an officer of Customs and Excise under those Acts may be exercised by officers of the Revenue Commissioners authorised to exercise those powers for the purposes of the said subsections and any provisions in relation to offences under those Acts shall apply, with any necessary modifications, in relation to the said subsections.

How are goods forfeited where there is a breach of VAT law?

(22) When detaining suspect goods that may be liable to forfeiture, an authorised VAT officer has the wide powers available under customs law to customs officers.

(23) Where an officer authorised by the Revenue Commissioners for the purposes of this subsection or a member of the Garda Síochána has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a criminal offence has been committed under the provisions of section 1078 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, in relation to tax, by a person who is not established in the State, or whom that officer believes is likely to leave the State, that officer may arrest that person.

Can a Revenue officer or a Garda arrest a person for breach of VAT law?

(23) An authorised Revenue officer or a Garda Síochána member may arrest a person he/she suspects of having committed a criminal Revenue offence if that person is not established in the State or if he/she believes that person is likely to leave the...

to read the full commentary
Print_icon
Contents Previous section Next section